аЯрЁБс>ўџ KMўџџџJџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅСq` №ПъbjbjqPqP 0::ъ џџџџџџЄЈЈЈЈЈЈЈо”КККК Ц r bоооооЙЙЙ˜ š š š š š š ${ hу *О ЈКЙЙККО ЈЈоолг x x x К‚ЈоЈо˜ x К˜ x x ЈЈx ов @зЬc™xЬК< x ˜ щ 0 x R  x Јx Й"лx ѓГЙЙЙО О n ЙЙЙ ККККrr$–$Кrr–КМаоЈЈЈЈЈЈџџџџ  Roger Keil excerpt from the Cities Grow Ontario: Urban Challenges and Prospects Report (pg 45): Planning, Growth and the Future of (Sub)Urban Ontario The next Ontario government has a chance to make a difference. We have seen a remarkable increase in urban populations across the province. Southern Ontario is now one big city, well captured in the term “Greater Golden Horseshoe” (GGH). Toronto in particular has outgrown its previous image of being Vienna (a dense European’ish core) surrounded by Phoenix (a sprawling low density American’ish suburban belt). This image was valid in the 20th century. Now Toronto is more like Los Angeles (a contiguous, mid-density American metropolis with a gentrified core and upscale pockets) surrounded by Shanghai or Hong Kong (a rapidly growing city of varying densities). This new, somewhat tongue- in-cheek metaphorical frame includes, of course, an implicit reference to globalized diversity but also new social segregation in both the city and the suburbs. The emerging urbanized landscape is scarcely understood, understudied and ill-equipped with outdated policies to prepare it for the challenges ahead. The current Liberal Ontario government has made huge strides in bringing some significant regula-tion to land use and transportation planning in Southern Ontario. The Greenbelt and GGH Growth plans contrasted nicely with the previous provincial government’s laissez-faire market liberalization and bungling of major social, environmental and economic issues in the urbanizing parts of the province. The new policy framework established a planning rationality that allowed both develop-ers and residents, environmentalists and investors to look ahead, debate the merits of various propos-als for growth and to make decisions. However the Liberals did not yet take us back to the heady and positive spirit of the early 1990s when the provincial NDP government initiated more interventionist policies that sought stricter land use controls (Sewell commission) and more substantial regional governance reform (Golden Report). McGuinty outflanked the existing governance rows between 416 and 905 by upscaling the planning frame to the GGH. This opened up new possibilities and allowed for new perspectives. The next government of Ontario must sustain and accelerate the process of regional-izing the urban policies that are needed to govern the southern part of the province. This will have to include a firm commitment to fund housing and transportation infrastructures that are socially just and environmentally sustainable. The spirit of Toronto’s Transit City plan (a vision meant to link the disconnected parts of the in-between cities in which most of us live) and Tower Renewal (a program to create both good jobs and healthy living environments for large numbers of residents) must be reawak-ened and expanded into the planning for an urbanized province. It must be the imperative of any new government to prevent the unleashing of urban sprawl that may come in the guise of tax cutting and austerity. The costs of those kinds of policies are well known and they are untenable. We had the his-torical precedent for this unfortunate mix of liberalization and punishing state action in the common sense revolution of the 1990s. Toronto and its region cannot afford this onslaught once again. What we need now is smart development instead of unbridled growth. The next provincial government will need to create the conditions for making this a reality. — Roger Keil, The City Institute at 91бЧЩЋ 1W_ab—˜™ЕЖщъѓхлдлЮК­ŠwaZ h#>Ph))ў+h#>Ph))ў6B*OJQJ]^JaJph%h#>Ph))ўB*OJQJ^JaJph%hЛ5|h))ўB*OJQJ^JaJphh))ўB*OJQJ^JaJphhЛ5|h))ўOJQJ^J'h#>Ph))ў5>*B*OJQJ^JphкU! h))ў^J h))ў6^JhЛ5|h))ў6^JhЛ5|h))ў6OJQJ^JhЛ5|h†tXOJQJ^J ab˜™„ ЕЖъоооооооойgd))ў! Ц& 0`Р№ P€Ар@Є1$7$8$H$gd))ў ъў.:p))ўАа/ Ар=!А"А#S$ %ААФАФ Ф†œ˜žžžžžžžž666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666Ј6666666666И666666666666hH66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666А6D@ёџD x ЧNormalЄШCJ_HaJmH sH tH DAђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRiѓџГR Н Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (kєџС( No List ъ џџџџъ ab˜™„Е Ж ь Р!ЌР!ьЙР!ьЙР!ЌР!jЄ Р!ЌР!ЌР!jЄР!jЄab˜™„Е Ж ь ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€ab˜™„Е Ж ь ˜0€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€˜0€€€ъ ъ ъ №8№@ёџџџ€€€ї№’№№0№( № №№B №S №ПЫџ ?№џџ~|X,™|XDь ——ь 9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€State€V*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/ dщ жт$ощilЯв&fo% *  ' P W ь ‰ь 3bѕщ ь ь х†tX))ўџ@€РLо ъ @@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial;& ‡z €џHelvetica7‡ŸGeorgia7я K@ŸCambria qˆ№аhЌљfЌљfз з щ№Shh€€24у у 2ƒQ№ќ§HP(ёџ?'џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ#>P2џџ_Roger Keil excerpt from the Cities Grow Ontario: Urban Challenges and Prospects Report (pg 45):Nishanthan Balasubramaniamsaramacўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0ИD˜ 0<P `l Œ ˜ ЄАИРШаф`Roger Keil excerpt from the Cities Grow Ontario: Urban Challenges and Prospects Report (pg 45):Nishanthan Balasubramaniam Normal.dotsaramac2Microsoft Office Word@Œ†G@ЌЗR™xЬ@ЌЗR™xЬз GрBџџџџVT$m _! ”  Чъ.ћМ"Systemъєfѓ“ юƒ9аC -ћœџ@Times New Roman-  2 НюьШ 1-Шь'џџћœџ@Times New Roman-ћœџ@Cambria--S2 3ю0ьШRoger Keil excerpt from the Cities Grow Ontario:=22,'C,,,-,'2'2H2,C,'H'2CH22'2!-;2 3С ьШ Urban Challenges and Prospects ?)456654-64.&5647)3&5.+#&Шь'џџ2 ЊюьШReport;.53(#2 Њ ьШ (pg 45)%5455% 2 ЊSьШ:1 2 ЊmьШ 18Шь'џџћœџ@Cambria- 2 юьШ 1;Шь'џџћœџМ@"Helvetica-ћœџМ@ Helvetica-- кU![2 ‘ю5ьШPlanning, Growth and the Future of (Sub)Urban OntarioC8====N';P!=8<=!=8==!='8=!!C==!H'=8=N=!8'=ќкU!- @ !№ D œюќџџџ-№-  2 ‘2 ьШ 1,Шь'џџћœџ@Georgia-  2 юьШ 12 Шь'џџ- €2 tюNьШThe next Ontario government has a chance to make a difference. We have seen a =2,2,3H2,!2123,!3N,22,',,2,3,,2N-2,,2!",!,3,,_,2,3,',,2, Шь'џџ 12 чюьШremarkable increase in urs!,N,!3,2,2,",,',22"g2 чу=ьШban populations across the province. Southern Ontario is now 2,22222,22',,!2''3,2!222,,8222,!2H2,!2'22H Шь'џџ ‹2 ZюUьШone big city, well captured in the term “Greater Golden Horseshoe” (GGH). Toronto in 22,21,0I,,,22"-222,,!N,H",,,!I22,2H2!','22-,!HIH"=2!2222 Шь'џџ Ž2 ЭюWьШparticular has outgrown its previous image of being Vienna (a dense European’ish core) 2,!,2,!3,'222!2H2'2!,222'N,1,3!2,31H,23,!,3,2',=3!23,,2!'2,2",! Шь'џџ .2 @юьШsurrounded by Phoenix ('2!!2222,240822,23!b2 @Ш:ьШa sprawling low density American’ish suburban belt). This ,'2!,H312H2,2'0HN,!,,3!'2'222!2,23,!=2' Шь'џџ 2 ГюMьШimage was valid in the 20th century. Now Toronto is more like Los Angeles (a N,1,H,'2,222,322,,22#0H2H=3!222'N2!,2,;2'H32,,'!, Шь'џџ "2 &юьШcontiguous, mid,221222'N2 2 &rьШ-1!w2 &“HьШdensity American metropolis with a gentrified core and upscale pockets) 2,2'0HN,!,,2N,!222'H2,2,2!!,2,2!,,2232',,,22,3,'! Шь'џџ =2 ™ю!ьШsurrounded by Shanghai or Hong Ko '2!!2222,24082,312,2!H231H2^2 ™А7ьШng (a rapidly growing city of varying densities). This 31!,!,2201!3H21,03!2,#0313,2','!=2' Шь'џџ )2 юьШnew, somewhat tongue2,H'2N,H2,2312- 2 …ьШ-1!2 ІьШ in2 2  ьШ-1!b2 .:ьШcheek metaphorical frame includes, of course, an implicit ,2,,2O,,222!-,!!-N,2,22,'2!,22!(,-2N2, Шь'џџ ”2 ю[ьШreference to globalized diversity but also new social segregation in both the city and the !,!-!,2-,2122,-,222,!'022,'22-H'2,,',2!-2,2222222,,0,223, Шь'џџ 42 ђюьШsuburbs. The emerging urban'222!2'=2,,N-"1213!2,2d2 ђ;ьШized landscape is scarcely understood, understudied and illw-,2,22',,3,'',-!,,0222-!'222222,!'22,2,22 2 ђЊьШ-1! Шь'џџ v2 e юGьШequipped with outdated policies to prepare it for the challenges ahead. ,2222,2H2222,,232,,'22!,2,",!2!3,,2,,32,',2-,2 2 e р ьШ 1. Шь'џџ €2 и юNьШThe current Liberal Ontario government has made huge strides in bringing some =2,,2!",2<2,",H2-!2122-!2N,22,'N,3-221,'!3,'22!2131'2N, Шь'џџ &2 K юьШsignificant regula'12!,,2"-12, 2 K ІьШ-1!42 K ЧьШtion to land use and transp222,222',,22!,2'2L2 K ф +ьШortation planning in Southern Ontario. The a3!,222,222128222,!2H2,!2=2, Шь'џџ €2 О юNьШGreenbelt and GGH Growth plans contrasted nicely with the previous provincial H!,,23,,22HHHH!3H22,2',22!,',22--0H22,2!,222'2!232,, Шь'џџ )2 1 юьШgovernment’s laissez122-!2N,2!','',- 2 1 7ьШ-1!b2 1 X:ьШfaire market liberalization and bungling of major social, !,",N,!2,2,",-,22,222221312!N,2!'2,, Шь'џџ _2 Є ю8ьШenvironmental and economic issues in the urbanizing part,22!22N,2,,22-,223N,''2,'22,2!2,2-212-!42 Є ђ ьШs of the province. The new '2!2,2!222-,=2,2,H Шь'џџ 2  юMьШpolicy framework established a planning rationality that allowed both develop 22-0"!,N,H3!2,',2'2,2,2,2231!,22,02,,2I,22222,2,22 2  #ьШ-1!2  DьШers and ,!',22 Шь'џџ Ž2 Š юWьШresidents, environmentalists and investors to look ahead, debate the merits of various !,'2,2',22!22N,2,'',2222,'2!'2222,2,,23,2,,2,N-!'2!2,!22' Шь'џџ 2 § юьШpropos2!222' 2 § ўьШ-1!U2 § 1ьШals for growth and to make decisions. However the,'!2!2!2H2,322N,2,2,,'22'H3H,2,!2,82 §  ьШ Liberals did not yet take us ;3,!,'22230,,3,2' Шь'џџ …2 p юQьШback to the heady and positive spirit of the early 1990s when the provincial NDP r2,,222,2-,40,2223'2,'2!2!2,,,!03222'H2,22,2!222,,HH8 Шь'џџ ’2 у юZьШgovernment initiated more interventionist policies that sought stricter land use controls 122-!2N,22,,2N2!,2,!2,222'22,,'2,'2212'!,,!,223',,22!2' Шь'џџ ^2 Vю7ьШ(Sewell commission) and more substantial regional gover!8,H,,2NN''22!,23N2!,'22',2,!-122-122,!82 Vю ьШnance reform (Golden Report). 3,2-,!-!2!N!H22,2C,22!! Шь'џџ †2 ЩюRьШMcGuinty outflanked the existing governance rows between 416 and 905 by upscaling Y,H22022!,23,22-,3'21122,!3,2-,!2I'2,H,,2222,222223022'-,21 Шь'џџ ‰2 <юTьШthe planning frame to the GGH. This opened up new possibilities and allowed for new 2,2,2221"!,N,22-HHH=2'22,2,2223,H22''2,',22,2H,2!2!3,H Шь'џџ e2 Џю<ьШperspectives. The next government of Ontario must sustain an2,!'2,,2,'=3,2,3132,!2N,22!H2-!2N2''2',2,252 Џž ьШd accelerate the process of 2,,-,,!,,2,2!2,,''3! Шь'џџ 2 "юьШregional!-122, 2 "5ьШ-1!}2 "VLьШizing the urban policies that are needed to govern the southern part of the -212,2!3,222,,'2,,!,3,,2,22122-!22,'222,!23,"2!2, Шь'џџ ‘2 •юYьШprovince. This will have to include a firm commitment to fund housing and transportation 2!222,,=2'H2,2,22,22,,!!N,2NNN,22!222222'21,23!,2'22!,22 Шь'џџ \2 ю6ьШinfrastructures that are socially just and environment2!!,'!2,2",'2,,",'3,,02',22,22!22N-2;2 ( ьШally sustainable. The spirit of ,0'2',2,2,=3,'3!2! Шь'џџ ‰2 {юTьШToronto’s Transit City plan (a vision meant to link the disconnected parts of the in=2!222!'=!,2'C02,2!,2'22N,,22222,2',222,,,23,!'2"2,2 2 {ЬьШ-1! Шь'џџ ‹2 ююUьШbetween cities in which most of us live) and Tower Renewal (a program to create both s2,H,,2,,'2H2,2N2'2!2'2,!,22=2I,!C,2,I,!,3!31!,N3,!,,,222 Шь'џџ \2 aю6ьШgood jobs and healthy living environments for large nu122222',223,,30321,22!22N,2'!3!,"2,2252 a… ьШmbers of residents) must be N2,!'2!",'2,2'!N2'2, Шь'џџ 2 дюьШreawak!,,I,2 2 дьШ-1!€2 д/NьШened and expanded into the planning for an urbanized province. It must be the ,3,2,22,32,22,2222,2,2221!3!-22!2,2-,22!222,, N2'2,2, Шь'џџ ‰2 GюTьШimperative of any new government to prevent the unleashing of urban sprawl that may N2,!,2,2!,403,H132,!2N,222!,3,22,22,,'2213!2!2,2'3!-H2,N-0 Шь'џџ d2 Кю;ьШcome in the guise of tax cutting and austerity. The costs on,2N,22,12',2!,3,221,22,2',!0=2-,2''282 Кя ьШf those kinds of policies are !22',222'2!22,,',!, Шь'џџ U2 -ю1ьШwell known and they are untenable. We had the hisH,222H2,222.0-!,22,2,2,_,2,22,2' 2 -ъ ьШ-1!F2 - 'ьШtorical precedent for this unfortunate 2!,,2!-,,3,2!2!2'22!2!22,, Шь'џџ Ž2  юWьШmix of liberalization and punishing state action in the common sense revolution of the N32!2,!,-,22,22222'221',,-,2222,,2NN22',2',!,223222!2, Шь'џџ V2 ю2ьШ1990s. Toronto and its region cannot afford this o2222'=2!222,22'!-122-,222,!!3!22'2D2 А &ьШnslaught once again. What we need now 2',21222-,-1,2_3,H,2-,222H Шь'џџ Œ2 †юVьШis smart development instead of unbridled growth. The next provincial government will ''N,!2,2,22N,22',,22!222!2,21!3H2=2,2,32!222,,123,!2N,2H Шь'џџ _2 љю8ьШneed to create the conditions for making this a reality.2,,22,",,,2,,22222'!2!N,2312',!,,0 2 љX ьШ 1. Шь'џџ-  2 mюьШ 12 Шь'џџћœџ@Georgia- -   2 оюьШ—1VV2 оD2ьШ Roger Keil, The City Institute at 91бЧЩЋF69/.E/>8/@#8';+##:#/9#=6.5L;5/.+#8-  2 оШ ьШ 1;-ШШььЧЧыыЦЦъъХХщщФФшшУУччТТццССххРРфф П Пу у  О От т  Н Нс с  М Мр р  Л Лп п ККооЙЙннИИммЗЗллЖЖккўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ0T hpˆ˜  ЈАИР Ш 4ф91бЧЩЋу ц `Roger Keil excerpt from the Cities Grow Ontario: Urban Challenges and Prospects Report (pg 45): Title ўџџџўџџџўџџџ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@AўџџџCDEFGHIўџџџ§џџџLўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF@HЯc™xЬN€Data џџџџџџџџџџџџ1TableџџџџWordDocumentџџџџ0SummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџшDDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџBCompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq