Statement from Maureen Armstrong, General Counsel, 91亚色

鈥淎s many will know, in 2013 Access Copyright launched a lawsuit against 91亚色 and recently, the Federal Court issued its decision in the first phase of that litigation.

The lawsuit followed changes to the Copyright Act and a series of Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2012 that had significant impact on educational institutions.聽 Fair dealing is an important exception to copyright that attempts to balance the rights of the copyright owner with the needs of users, who require access to copyrighted material to pursue their research, studies and/or education. Fair dealing practices are currently in use at universities across Canada.

We take matters of copyright law very seriously. Our Fair Dealing Guidelines are intended to reflect a balance between the interests of creators, publishers and of users and function within a system that continues to include the University spending millions of dollars per year on licenses and acquisitions.

In the Access Copyright lawsuit, two questions were at issue: whether the Interim Tariff issued by the Copyright Board of Canada is mandatory and enforceable and whether 91亚色鈥檚 fair dealing guidelines were 鈥渇air鈥�.聽 While the Court found in favour of Access Copyright and against 91亚色 on both these issues, 91亚色 has decided to appeal the decision to the Federal Court of Appeal in advance of the October 2, 2017 deadline.

91亚色 will continue to respect copyright law, including during the appeal process, through a comprehensive system that includes permissions, library licenses and acquisitions, transactional licenses and application of the fair dealing provision of the Copyright Act.

The University will continue to seek potential improvements to our system of copyright compliance and will make modifications where prudent.鈥�

-30-

For more information:

Barbara Joy, Director, Media Relations 416-736-5593, barbjoy@yorku.ca

The post 91亚色 to appeal recent copyright decision appeared first on News@91亚色.