91亚色

Skip to main content Skip to local navigation

New book revisits maternal thinking as a concept

Mothers think. That was a revolutionary concept聽at one time, and may still be in some quarters聽鈥 myth shattering and at the same time obvious. For 91亚色 women鈥檚 studies Professor Andrea O鈥橰eilly, it was life changing and groundbreaking, and was delivered by Sara Ruddick through her 1989 book Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. It was a book O鈥橰eilly couldn鈥檛 put down. She still has it and, although it鈥檚 a bit battered and stained with sand and water, she has read it over a dozen times.

It is this 鈥渁ha鈥 moment that O鈥橰eilly talks about in her introduction to Maternal Thinking: Philosophy, Politics, Practice (Demeter Press, 2009), along with the impact the concepts in聽Ruddick's book had on her life and the discipline of women鈥檚 studies as a whole.

鈥淔or me, and I suspect for most mothers and scholars of motherhood, this is what made Maternal Thinking [Towards a Politics of Peace] so life-changing and groundbreaking,鈥 writes O鈥橰eilly in Maternal Thinking: Philosophy, Politics, Practice, which she edited. Ruddick 鈥渢heorized the obvious: mothers think.鈥 O鈥橰eilly calls it a 鈥渕onumental text鈥 and one of the most significant works in maternal scholarship and the new field of motherhood studies.

She can remember being excited and absorbed by passages from Ruddick鈥檚 book, such as: 鈥淭he work of mothering demands that mothers think; out of this need for thoughtfulness, a distinctive discipline emerges.鈥 Those were words that would stay with her. She circled the page number on which she read them twice and underlined the words. O鈥橰eilly had three children under the age of six at the time and was working on her PhD. Ruddick鈥檚 words were affirming and validating.

鈥淩uddick鈥檚 concept of maternal practice and thinking, divested of biological nature, instinct and sentiment, is fore-grounded in what all mothers know: motherwork is inherently and profoundly an intellectual activity,鈥 writes O鈥橰eilly. 鈥淲hen mothers set out to fulfill the demands of mother-work, what Ruddick defines as protection, nurturance and training, they are engaged in maternal practice; this engagement, in turn, gives rise to a specific discipline of thought, a cluster of attitudes, beliefs, and values which Ruddick calls maternal thinking.鈥

Two decades later, O鈥橰eilly continues to revere Ruddick and her work. Maternal Thinking: Philosophy, Politics, Practice, a collection of 17 essays from diverse disciplines, everything from anthropology, sociology, literature and philosophy to education, women鈥檚 studies and psychology, is a celebration of the 20th anniversary of Ruddick鈥檚 Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace.

Right: Andrea O'Reilly

O鈥橰eilly sat down with Ruddick in her apartment for an almost two-hour-long conversation that continued long after the interview was over. They discussed what Ruddick鈥檚 head space was at the time of writing her book, what things have changed and what they agree and disagree on. Ruddick is very present in the new book through the conversation as well as its epilogue, which she wrote. The essays in the book revisit Ruddick鈥檚 work and examine the 鈥減ivotal insights鈥 of the text.

The essays range from University of Michigan-Dearborn Professor Maureen Linker鈥檚 鈥淓xplaining the World: Philosophical Reflections on Feminism and Mothering鈥 and California State University San Marcos Professor Linda Pershing鈥檚 鈥淐indy Sheehan: A Call to Maternal Activism in the Contemporary Peace Movement鈥 to Assumption College, Worcester, Professor Regina Edmonds鈥 鈥淢aternal Thinking Expanded: A Psychologist鈥檚 View鈥 and O鈥橰eilly鈥檚 鈥淔eminist Mothering as Maternal Practice: Maternal Authority and Social Acceptability of Children鈥.

O鈥橰eilly is founder and director of 91亚色鈥檚 Association for Research on Mothering and an associate professor in the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies' School of Women's Studies. She is the author of Toni Morrison and Motherhood: A Politics of the Heart (SUNY Press, 2004) and Rocking the Cradle: Thoughts on Motherhood, Feminism and the Possibility of Empowered Mothering (Demeter Press, 2006). She is the editor of 14 collections, including with Elizabeth Podnieks Textual Mothers Maternal Texts: Motherhood in Contemporary Women鈥檚 Literatures (Wilfred Laurier University Press, 2009) and is the editor of the forthcoming, first-ever encyclopedia on motherhood.

For more information, visit the Demeter Press Web site.

By Sandra McLean, YFile writer

Republished courtesy of YFile 鈥 91亚色鈥檚 daily e-bulletin.