91亚色

Skip to main content Skip to local navigation

Scientific evidence and medical advice should rule COVID-19 decisions

91亚色 researchers found much less support for economics as the primary driver

TORONTO, April 14, 2020聽鈥 Most Canadians believe scientific evidence (82%) and advice from medical doctors (78%) should be the key influences affecting government decisions for COVID-19, with only 48 per cent putting economic considerations among the top three, research led by 91亚色 has found.

But when asked to select up to three things they thought were聽actually聽influencing government decisions, economic considerations (56%), scientific evidence (53%) and advice from medical doctors (53%) were all at the top.

鈥淐anadians were in high agreement that medical and scientific evidence should be driving our response to the Coronavirus, but saw a wider range of factors as currently influencing the direction,鈥 says Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies Assistant聽, who is leading the project, which聽聽from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council to track how Canadians understand and perceive the outbreak.

While Canadian put economics as the third consideration that should influence decisions, nearly half of those surveyed had experienced negative changes at work 鈥 including unpaid leave, reduced hours, or being laid off entirely 鈥 and 27 per cent said they would have money issues if asked to self-isolate for 14 days. That included the inability to pay rent or bills, such as electricity, or afford groceries.

罢丑别听Canadian COVID-19 Social Impacts Survey聽looked at risk perceptions, trust, impacts and responses across the country from March 20 to April 12, and received some 2,029 responses. The team includes 91亚色 Associate Professor聽聽of the Faculty of Health and Associate Professor聽聽of the University of Guelph. The team has also collaborated with other researchers across Canada, including Associate Professor聽聽at the University of Ottawa, to help track critical measures over the course of the outbreak.

鈥淭he report represents the first in a series of rapid dissemination efforts to share our findings with practitioners and decision-makers to support their response to this crisis,鈥 says Kennedy. 鈥淥ur survey is based on input and needs identified by public health practitioners and aims to support the long-term Canadian response.鈥

Another surprising finding is that compared to influenza, respondents were more concerned about the severity of COVID-19 and the likelihood of many Canadians being affected 鈥 but are less worried about personally getting sick. Some 85 per cent of respondents disagreed that 鈥渢he Coronavirus will not affect very many people in Canada,鈥 while only two per cent agreed. When asked the same question about influenza on a 2019 survey, 20 per cent agreed. In other words, Canadians are highly concerned about COVID-19 with 94 per cent either agreeing or strongly agreeing that catching the virus can be serious, but only 23 per cent of Canadians believe they are likely to become sick with it.

鈥淭his is a counterintuitive finding with important implications for public health agencies. Canadians are worried about the Coronavirus in general, but there is a chance that their views of personal risk don鈥檛 align with their views of risks to others,鈥 says Kennedy.

The researchers also found 80 to 84 per cent of Canadians support government interventions to mitigate the COVID-19 outbreak, however, less than 60 per cent support mandatory Coronavirus vaccinations when available. Broadly supported interventions include cancelling public events, closing places of worship, encouraging people to stay home, mandatory home isolation for potential exposure, and closing schools.

鈥淚n general, this seems to suggest a relatively high degree of support for collective mitigation actions designed to help the hospitals maintain sufficient capacity,鈥 says Kennedy. 鈥淭racking these social dimensions over the long term is critical for informing policy as we attempt to flatten the curve for an extended period of time.鈥

The full report,聽Canadian COVID-19 Social Impacts Survey, is available on the聽听飞别产蝉颈迟别.

-30-

91亚色 champions new ways of thinking that drive teaching and research excellence. Our students receive the education they need to create big ideas that make an impact on the world. Meaningful and sometimes unexpected careers result from cross-disciplinary programming, innovative course design and diverse experiential learning opportunities. 91亚色 students and graduates push limits, achieve goals and find solutions to the world鈥檚 most pressing social challenges, empowered by a strong community that opens minds. 91亚色 U is an internationally recognized research university 鈥 our 11 faculties and 25 research centres have partnerships with 200+ leading universities worldwide. Located in Toronto, 91亚色 is the third largest university in Canada, with a strong community of 53,000 students, 7,000 faculty and administrative staff, and more than 300,000 alumni. 91亚色 U's fully bilingual Glendon Campus is home to Southern Ontario's Centre of Excellence for French Language and Bilingual Postsecondary Education.

Media Contact:

Sandra McLean,聽91亚色 Media Relations, 416-272-6317,聽sandramc@yorku.ca

Find out more about how 91亚色 is creating positive change in the COVID-19 pandemic聽here.