This year鈥檚 Canadian Writers in Person Lecture Series featured author David Chariandy, who visited 91亚色 on March 19 to talk about his award-winning book,听Brother.听91亚色 Teaching Assistant Dana Patrascu-Kingsley听sent the following report to听YFile.
The Canadian Writers in Person series at 91亚色 ended this year with David Chariandy鈥檚 visit. He spoke about his novel听Brother, winner of the prestigious Rogers Writer鈥檚 Trust Fiction Prize.
Set in 1990s Scarborough,听Brother听is a novel about two brothers, sons of Trinidadian immigrants, growing up with a single mother, who has to work several jobs to make ends meet. Their coming of age is set against the prejudices that confront them as young men of black and brown ancestry.
Chariandy said that this book took him 10 years to write because 鈥渢his is a novel I wanted to get right.鈥 It is about a lot of issues impossible to ignore: state violence, police violence, communities that are ignored, love and tension between parents and children.
Chariandy spoke about the contradiction of being a fiction writer and writing about fates he has glimpsed. This novel is not simply presenting his life story, but asking the question 鈥渨hat if鈥: what if his family situation had been a bit different, what if he had given in to anger, what if one of the police encounters had proven fatal. By asking these questions, Chariandy is making us contemplate how common variations on this story are, and how seemingly easy it is for the life of a young black man to be lost to tragedy.
This novel shows us how the stigmatization of individuals, groups of people and whole neighbourhoods has a real effect. The author said that he 鈥渢ried not to portray Scarborough as a place of waste and ugliness. It has problems, but there is beauty in the lives of people who live there and in the realities they cultivate.鈥
Violence is a fact of life for many people, but Chariandy did not want to make a spectacle of violence in this novel. 鈥淚 wasn鈥檛 looking to write a hood novel,鈥 he said. There is no depiction of Francis getting shot. The whole point is everything else: the friendships, the music bringing people together, the community.
This novel deals with the 鈥渃omplicated grief鈥 of losing a son and a brother. Chariandy said that he is 鈥渨eary of the rhetoric of 鈥榞etting over鈥 loss, because disenfranchised people are persistently asked to get over things. Maybe the issue is not getting over something, but holding on to something and allowing life to proceed.鈥
Originally published on
